|
Author | Message |
---|
Darkerik Beginner
Posts : 74
| Subject: The judgment of Dragons Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:02 pm | |
| I like biulding cheap decks so i dicided biulding this one and it workd beater than i ever seen dragons work out(as long as u have your red eyes not banised by your opp)
33 monsters: 1x Red-eyes Darkness Metal dragon 3x Judgment dragon 3x Lightpulsar dragon 3x Darkfalre dragon 1x DAD 1x Black Luster Solder - EOTB 1x Chaos sorcerer 2x Eclipse wayvern 1x Divine dragon Apocralyph 2x Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress 2x Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner 2x Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter 1x Garoth, Lightsworn Warrior 1x Jain, Lightsworn Paladin 1x Ehren, Lightsworn Monk 1x Wulf, Lightsworn Beast 1x Gorz, The emissary of Darkness 2x Tragoedia 2x Dimnesional Alchemist 2x Card Trooper 1x D.D. Crow
Spell: 1x Charge of the Light Brigade 3x Solar Recharge 1x Pot of Avarice 1x Monster Reborn 1x Foolish Burial 1x Dark Hole 1x Heavy Storm
i have extra but i used it only once in 50 duels and that is to summon giga brilliant
Suggestions are all accepted if u explain why do u suggest that or why is good in this deck
soon i will make a deck profile so that u guys can see my explaination of tech cards |
|
| |
iNubz Beginner
Posts : 843
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:48 pm | |
| personally i dont like dimensional alchemist in here because what happens if u banish a spell like reborn or if u banish a good monster such as REDMD? and being as u banish a lot of monsters with almost no way of getting them back except alchemist i suggest -2 alchemist and +2 D.D.R. Different Dimension Reincarnation. or if u really want alchemist then -1 alchemist and +1 Return from the Different Dimension now being as u mill quite a bit which often means u mill good cards such as REDMD and stuff i suggest 2 monster reincarnations to get them back so u can either get JD or REDMD etc etc this is a card that not many people use in dragons but perhaps plaguespreader zombie and add synchros to extra deck? i mean plague spreader can be great with getting rid of the wulf in ur hand and then milling it in the end phase and it could also be used as discard fodder its also a dark so fuel for chaos or bls or DAD being as u didnt post your side deck i can only give u suggestions. some of these u may or may not have i dont know cuz u didnt post it... so: definitely decree incase of light/shadow imprisoning mirrors. or if u dont like filling up your back row then definitely at least 2 msts.
|
|
| |
blossomswilt Intermediate Duelist
Posts : 412
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:34 am | |
| If you want to run a deck like this, it is best to run only 40 cards, since you want to get cards you need as specific as possible. The changes I have made are : Cards Taken Out -1 Judgment Dragon. -1 Light Pulsar Dragon -1 Dark Flare Dragon. -1 D.D. Crow -2 Dimensional Alchemist. : Cards added in. +3 Royal decree I took out 1 Judgment dragon since they can be a dead draw if you are having too many of them. And with having a 40 card deck, their is a 60% chance that you will draw one of them, and you usually don't want to draw JD too early in the game. I took out one of each; Light Pulsar and Dark Flare since it won't be as necessary to utilize their effects since REDMD is only at 1. Though, they can still be good to use for an extra beater, and also a target for themselves in a sense. Hence why I kept 2 of each in there. D.D. Crow isn't necessary in the main deck, since you may be going against decks, such as Madolche, that don't necessarily use cards in their graveyard, and if you were to be matched up with a deck such as one of those, than D.D. crow would become a dead draw, and quite unnecessary. It should be put in the side for sure though. Dimensional Alchemist is an Okay card, but it runs a bit slow for a deck such as this one, which is why I took it out. You can put it in side, or keep it in main if you'd like. I am just here to give ideas/ and or help. Now for the cards I added in which were 3 royal decrees. The reason why I added decrees in is since you don't have any traps, and you want to utilize all of your monsters to their best, you should run these to pass mirror force, solemns, and other cards/ Well I hoped my ideas help. Hope you have fun with them. |
|
| |
Darkerik Beginner
Posts : 74
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:28 pm | |
| i put out 1 jd 1 flare 1 alcemist and 1 lumina then i put in 1 honest and 1 plag d.d. crow -.- : it's a dark that gets to grave whenever you want and for the second bonus it BANISHEDS 1 opp key grave card PRO players need to know this so i'm puting this out becoes some of you guys my not know this (mybe u do but u dont notice it ) NOT TRAP = Your opp has dead MST AND HEAVY (today that is like 2-4 cards in main ) oh yea side will be showed and explaind in the video this will be my first profesional deck profile (i done it before but it wasnt as good as i hoped) |
|
| |
iNubz Beginner
Posts : 843
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:43 pm | |
| even so..... you should put decrees in side because if you have no traps then u have a rematch and side then your opp will think u have no traps and side mst and heavy out and if u side decree in (if they use a lot of trap) then well you dont have to worry about their spell/trap destroyers. that is the case for most people because im studying psychology. anyway so yeh side decree if u have not already. |
|
| |
Darkerik Beginner
Posts : 74
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:14 pm | |
| that is 85% ture but u must think 4-6 moves ahead of your opp evry avareg duelist will do that but any good duelist will see what does your opp side like my case on a turney when i played bw aganst dw i done this opp sided 3 cards (so i thot 2 decree and 1ddcrow or shadow mirror) so i seded in the second mst and prohebition and light inprisoning mirror i played that duel whit 2-1 Lost (last duel top deck BLS JUST HAVE TO HAVE THAT LUCK) And yea i have attended psy. class for the last 4 years and yea i know somthing to but not much becoes i listend only when he tlaked how to read ppl |
|
| |
iNubz Beginner
Posts : 843
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:40 pm | |
| lolz psychology is really fun cuz u get to break people and watch them cry(<--- for bullys and mean people of course) anyway u have shadow imprisoning mirror in blackwings??? |
|
| |
Darkerik Beginner
Posts : 74
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:44 pm | |
| no that he sided on me i sided light inprisoning ehh bullys are stuped so u dont need psy. well i realy don't have problems whit them but i like to have fun whit ppl/teachers whit great power comes greater fun |
|
| |
iNubz Beginner
Posts : 843
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:11 pm | |
| so so true :3 but why would u side light imprisoning mirror against dark world? o.O |
|
| |
Darkerik Beginner
Posts : 74
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:22 pm | |
| he played some fabled boost and honest and veilers so thats why |
|
| |
iNubz Beginner
Posts : 843
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:32 pm | |
| but.... light imprisoning mirror dont stop veiler or honest......... cuz they activate in hand |
|
| |
blossomswilt Intermediate Duelist
Posts : 412
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:57 pm | |
| True. Another one could be ummm. Pulling the rug is it? Or debunk? I don't remember which is which. But yeah, helps. To side at least |
|
| |
iNubz Beginner
Posts : 843
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:07 am | |
| its debunk, debunk is a counter trap that negates a monster eff that activates in the hand or grave so bye bye veiler and honest. pulling the rug is a counter trap that negates the effect of a monster that activates when a monster(including itself) is normal summoned so bye bye e hero stratos or tour guide of the underworld |
|
| |
blossomswilt Intermediate Duelist
Posts : 412
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:44 am | |
| Yup. :3 So I had a point.! ^.^ Heheh |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: The judgment of Dragons | |
| |
|
| |
|